<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Me vs We</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/</link>
	<description>Where I think I might write some stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pronebird</title>
		<link>http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>pronebird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laurakalbag.com/?p=205#comment-504</guid>
		<description>I think when individuals are saying &#039;we&#039; it means the one thing only -- they want to seem more than they are. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think when individuals are saying &#039;we&#039; it means the one thing only &#8212; they want to seem more than they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roni</title>
		<link>http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>roni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laurakalbag.com/?p=205#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s take as a parallel construction: You call an architect then building company. 
What guarantee do you have that this building company does all the work in-house ? Any ? 
They will sub-contract some parts (99% of time): roofing, electricity, water, whatever..., to some specialist in that field... It&#039;s not &quot;pure outsourcing&quot; since it local real life... but same process. 
 
Let&#039;s take another example : GM, the car maker... Do you think they build in house all the parts of your car ? Do you even think what&#039;s sub-contracted is 100%  produced in the US ? 
Are you aware of where your car&#039;s brakes are made? lights? seats?gear-box ? and by whom ? 
No, because you buy a GM made car. And anyway, you don&#039;t care, bcs you buy a GM car. And GM is responsible for the quality ! 
 
I don&#039;t think freelancers should say &quot;btw, I outsource this part&quot; when this does not apply for any other company ! 
If a client has done basic research he should have a ruff idea of what he is buying and how much it costs. Then to him to ask &quot;Why so cheaper ?&quot; or &quot;How come you are expert everywhere?&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#039;s take as a parallel construction: You call an architect then building company.</p>
<p>What guarantee do you have that this building company does all the work in-house ? Any ?</p>
<p>They will sub-contract some parts (99% of time): roofing, electricity, water, whatever&#8230;, to some specialist in that field&#8230; It&#039;s not &quot;pure outsourcing&quot; since it local real life&#8230; but same process.</p>
<p>Let&#039;s take another example : GM, the car maker&#8230; Do you think they build in house all the parts of your car ? Do you even think what&#039;s sub-contracted is 100%  produced in the US ?</p>
<p>Are you aware of where your car&#039;s brakes are made? lights? seats?gear-box ? and by whom ?</p>
<p>No, because you buy a GM made car. And anyway, you don&#039;t care, bcs you buy a GM car. And GM is responsible for the quality !</p>
<p>I don&#039;t think freelancers should say &quot;btw, I outsource this part&quot; when this does not apply for any other company !</p>
<p>If a client has done basic research he should have a ruff idea of what he is buying and how much it costs. Then to him to ask &quot;Why so cheaper ?&quot; or &quot;How come you are expert everywhere?&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laurakalbag.com/?p=205#comment-196</guid>
		<description>@roni I&#039;m not at all against outsourcing as a rule, I just think that freelancers should be honest and make their clients aware of the fact they outsource their work. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@roni I&#039;m not at all against outsourcing as a rule, I just think that freelancers should be honest and make their clients aware of the fact they outsource their work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roni</title>
		<link>http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>roni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laurakalbag.com/?p=205#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Why would you be annoyed if you find out it has been outsourced ? 
 
This is kind of silly, if I may ! 
 
Why silly ? 
 
- You can outsource some part of a job in order to get higher quality. (for same money) 
- You can outsource to have lower cost. (with same quality) 
- You can outsource to speed up production in order to meet deadline. (bcs you are late since you are dead busy but don&#039;t want to pay penalties) 
 
So?  What&#039;d be your call ?  
 
I don&#039;t get the idea of been against outsourcing because.. .well... &quot;because I am against !!&quot; 
 
You can build up a team of expert and manage that team, produce high quality work. Who&#039;s going to suffer ?  
Now indeed, you hit another field of job, more project management than &quot;design&quot; or however you want to call it; but when you got your own business, and hopefully got to get a few clients at the same time, search for the future at the same time etc... well, doesn&#039;t it comes to a few hours of PM a day ? 
 
And when you business is so packed with orders for 1 month or so... what are you going to do ? Turn down clients ? sleep 2 hours a night ? hire someone for 1 month ? Or outsource a couple of tasks ? 
 
Many companies do, I agree, outsource with only in mind the idea of profit, pay less charge more,  but that&#039;s not everything behind outsourcing and this eventually fails as quality is missing. 
 
You can outsource as well, with great outcome, for 1 million good reasons ! 
 
Note : I am an outsourcer. The money is ok in the country I live in, would not allow to survive in yours, for sure. 
The only pride I have &amp; take is in the quality of the apps I deliver to my clients. I have no credits, not recognition or all that, only the satisfaction of  quality work. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you be annoyed if you find out it has been outsourced ?</p>
<p>This is kind of silly, if I may !</p>
<p>Why silly ?</p>
<p>- You can outsource some part of a job in order to get higher quality. (for same money)</p>
<p>- You can outsource to have lower cost. (with same quality)</p>
<p>- You can outsource to speed up production in order to meet deadline. (bcs you are late since you are dead busy but don&#039;t want to pay penalties)</p>
<p>So?  What&#039;d be your call ? </p>
<p>I don&#039;t get the idea of been against outsourcing because.. .well&#8230; &quot;because I am against !!&quot;</p>
<p>You can build up a team of expert and manage that team, produce high quality work. Who&#039;s going to suffer ? </p>
<p>Now indeed, you hit another field of job, more project management than &quot;design&quot; or however you want to call it; but when you got your own business, and hopefully got to get a few clients at the same time, search for the future at the same time etc&#8230; well, doesn&#039;t it comes to a few hours of PM a day ?</p>
<p>And when you business is so packed with orders for 1 month or so&#8230; what are you going to do ? Turn down clients ? sleep 2 hours a night ? hire someone for 1 month ? Or outsource a couple of tasks ?</p>
<p>Many companies do, I agree, outsource with only in mind the idea of profit, pay less charge more,  but that&#039;s not everything behind outsourcing and this eventually fails as quality is missing.</p>
<p>You can outsource as well, with great outcome, for 1 million good reasons !</p>
<p>Note : I am an outsourcer. The money is ok in the country I live in, would not allow to survive in yours, for sure.</p>
<p>The only pride I have &amp; take is in the quality of the apps I deliver to my clients. I have no credits, not recognition or all that, only the satisfaction of  quality work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ErisDS</title>
		<link>http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>ErisDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laurakalbag.com/?p=205#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Seems like you&#039;ve caused a bit of controversy! I totally agree with you though, &quot;me&quot;s who outright just pretend they&#039;re &quot;we&quot;s are twisting at least one fact, so how do you know they&#039;re not twisting others?

It makes me feel really really uncomfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like you&#8217;ve caused a bit of controversy! I totally agree with you though, &#8220;me&#8221;s who outright just pretend they&#8217;re &#8220;we&#8221;s are twisting at least one fact, so how do you know they&#8217;re not twisting others?</p>
<p>It makes me feel really really uncomfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Quick</title>
		<link>http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Quick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laurakalbag.com/?p=205#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Note: My staff work from their own houses .. they don&#039;t all come to mine every day! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note: My staff work from their own houses .. they don&#039;t all come to mine every day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Quick</title>
		<link>http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Quick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laurakalbag.com/?p=205#comment-187</guid>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://elliotjaystocks.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://elliotjaystocks.com/&lt;/a&gt;  
 
Microsoft, Virgin 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://hicksdesign.co.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://hicksdesign.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt;  
 
Opera, Linotype, Firefox 
 
Honestly, it&#039;s a myth and an excuse that big companies won&#039;t work with individuals. 
 
And before you say &quot;but I&#039;m not Elliot Jay Stocks&quot; then that doesn&#039;t change anything! 
 
Who&#039;s fault is that?  If the reason you&#039;re not getting work is because you&#039;re not as good as someone who is then deal with it.  Either get better or accept you&#039;re gonna deal with smaller clients. 
 
But don&#039;t think for a second that not being able to say &quot;we&quot; is the issue. 
 
Big companies don&#039;t want 2 sh*t people over 1 talented one! 
 
Just another point .. do you honestly think big companies don&#039;t check up on you first? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://elliotjaystocks.com/" rel="nofollow">http://elliotjaystocks.com/</a>  </p>
<p>Microsoft, Virgin</p>
<p>  <a href="http://hicksdesign.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://hicksdesign.co.uk/</a>  </p>
<p>Opera, Linotype, Firefox</p>
<p>Honestly, it&#039;s a myth and an excuse that big companies won&#039;t work with individuals.</p>
<p>And before you say &quot;but I&#039;m not Elliot Jay Stocks&quot; then that doesn&#039;t change anything!</p>
<p>Who&#039;s fault is that?  If the reason you&#039;re not getting work is because you&#039;re not as good as someone who is then deal with it.  Either get better or accept you&#039;re gonna deal with smaller clients.</p>
<p>But don&#039;t think for a second that not being able to say &quot;we&quot; is the issue.</p>
<p>Big companies don&#039;t want 2 sh*t people over 1 talented one!</p>
<p>Just another point .. do you honestly think big companies don&#039;t check up on you first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Hawker</title>
		<link>http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hawker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laurakalbag.com/?p=205#comment-193</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Rich Quick&quot;&gt;
But to be honest, what’s the difference between you pretending you have staff and you pretending you’re an 33 year old bloke with stubble and a bit of a spare tyre?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey, I resemble that remark!

Not quite the age, but it&#039;s close enough to hit hard... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="Rich Quick"><p>
But to be honest, what’s the difference between you pretending you have staff and you pretending you’re an 33 year old bloke with stubble and a bit of a spare tyre?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey, I resemble that remark!</p>
<p>Not quite the age, but it&#8217;s close enough to hit hard&#8230; ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Quick</title>
		<link>http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Quick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laurakalbag.com/?p=205#comment-185</guid>
		<description>1) I want to get bigger clients, and like it or not, they won&#8217;t use individuals for big complex projects 
 
Nonsense. 
 
They&#039;ll use an individual.  It&#039;s all in your head. 
 
You don&#039;t believe they&#039;d want you .. and so you probably never asked. 
 
It&#039;s like saying &quot;that stunning girl would never go our with an bloke like me.&quot; 
 
Actually, she probably would.  I&#039;ve seen stunning girls with ugly blokes (that aren&#039;t rich) .. it&#039;s probably at least partly down to the fact the ugly bloke she&#039;s with actually asked her out .. and partly down to the confidence he had. 
 
It&#039;s the same with a big company.  If you don&#039;t ask them .. or you don&#039;t put across the plus points of being an individual, sure they won&#039;t hire you.  But that&#039;s your fault for not selling yourself well enough. 
 
Plus points of being an individual: 
 
- you&#039;re a big client to me.  Not like some big ad agency where you&#039;re just another number to invoice.  I&#039;ll pull out all the stops for you. 
 
- I&#039;m cheaper, because I have lower overheads 
 
- You spend less money and get a better developer to boot!  An ad agency charges you &#163;100/hr and in return you get a &#163;10/hr developer. The rest goes on overheads and profit.  I charge you &#163;35/hr and you get a &#163;35/hr developer.  My overheads are lower, and I&#039;m not passing the work on to some junior who&#039;s not that good. 
 
- I don&#039;t mean to be rude, but I&#039;m better than the agency.  They can&#039;t afford me - that&#039;s why I&#039;m freelance.  They have to hire somebody cheaper. 
 
Etc etc etc 
 
As for the &quot;for complex projects&quot; bit.  You shouldn&#039;t take on projects that are too complex for you anyway, so if that&#039;s an issue you&#039;re pitching for the wrong work. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) I want to get bigger clients, and like it or not, they won&rsquo;t use individuals for big complex projects</p>
<p>Nonsense.</p>
<p>They&#039;ll use an individual.  It&#039;s all in your head.</p>
<p>You don&#039;t believe they&#039;d want you .. and so you probably never asked.</p>
<p>It&#039;s like saying &quot;that stunning girl would never go our with an bloke like me.&quot;</p>
<p>Actually, she probably would.  I&#039;ve seen stunning girls with ugly blokes (that aren&#039;t rich) .. it&#039;s probably at least partly down to the fact the ugly bloke she&#039;s with actually asked her out .. and partly down to the confidence he had.</p>
<p>It&#039;s the same with a big company.  If you don&#039;t ask them .. or you don&#039;t put across the plus points of being an individual, sure they won&#039;t hire you.  But that&#039;s your fault for not selling yourself well enough.</p>
<p>Plus points of being an individual:</p>
<p>- you&#039;re a big client to me.  Not like some big ad agency where you&#039;re just another number to invoice.  I&#039;ll pull out all the stops for you.</p>
<p>- I&#039;m cheaper, because I have lower overheads</p>
<p>- You spend less money and get a better developer to boot!  An ad agency charges you &pound;100/hr and in return you get a &pound;10/hr developer. The rest goes on overheads and profit.  I charge you &pound;35/hr and you get a &pound;35/hr developer.  My overheads are lower, and I&#039;m not passing the work on to some junior who&#039;s not that good.</p>
<p>- I don&#039;t mean to be rude, but I&#039;m better than the agency.  They can&#039;t afford me &#8211; that&#039;s why I&#039;m freelance.  They have to hire somebody cheaper.</p>
<p>Etc etc etc</p>
<p>As for the &quot;for complex projects&quot; bit.  You shouldn&#039;t take on projects that are too complex for you anyway, so if that&#039;s an issue you&#039;re pitching for the wrong work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Rinaldi</title>
		<link>http://blog.laurakalbag.com/me-vs-we/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Rinaldi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laurakalbag.com/?p=205#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Great post. I actually had a similar revelation a while back related to my work running a conference in Boston (&lt;a href=&quot;http://riaunleashed.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RIA Unleashed&lt;/a&gt;). For the longest time I always said &quot;we&quot; until one day I decided it was just silly since it was only me. Since then, I often have to catch myself reverting to &quot;we&quot; but always go back and correct it. For me, a large part of it is is selfish in that I deserve credit for the work if I do it. We seems to disperse credit to unnamed persons. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I actually had a similar revelation a while back related to my work running a conference in Boston (<a href="http://riaunleashed.com" rel="nofollow">RIA Unleashed</a>). For the longest time I always said &quot;we&quot; until one day I decided it was just silly since it was only me. Since then, I often have to catch myself reverting to &quot;we&quot; but always go back and correct it. For me, a large part of it is is selfish in that I deserve credit for the work if I do it. We seems to disperse credit to unnamed persons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

